Brad I agree that the having the Calendar and the FX button like Business Rules or in a Status Action Edit Attribute with the Operator set to Set to Field would give the most flexibility. You could either use Process Date, compare to a base or EA date field, and be able to add or subtract time from any of the dates used.
You can also use business rules to kick off a project template when Job Starter submitted.
We have the same issue. The only way we could replicate our name convention (and others I have seen at other Aprimo customers) would be the ability to create a field by concatenating multiple fields together. Example would be Activity ID - Type of Piece (EA) - Suggested Project Title (EA) . If we could set title with a new concatenating ea though a port status action, we could update to Project Title before the first task is seen.
I would agree this functionality would be useful. I would like to see the ability to dynamically set duration and roles on tasks with criteria like a port. Example of roles would be for a review maybe writer and project manager need to review if one condition is true, and just the project manager if a different condition is true. In regards to duration, I could see multiple levels of complexity and the duration's would match that. Example would be High, Medium, Low and each would have a separate duration associated with it.
If there was a token user << Work Requestor >> that would give the flexibility to default Owner and Activity Admin to the requestor like and Activity defaults to or set another user if business process demands it.
If a Effective Start Date and / or Effective End Date is entered, when the Out of Office indicator is set to Yes, OOO should not start immediately, but should either begin when the Effective Start Date is met. OOO should automatically turn off when the Effective End Date is met and after that point the Out of Office Indicator should be reset to No.
Customer support service by UserEcho