It would be great if DAM allowed for cascading fields the way the MRM side does. Currently the workaround in DAM is very complicated and clunky.
For users using both DAM and MO, they would like to see consistency in the way to configure the cascading fields. The way to configure the cascading is more user friendly in MO.
The DAM supports cascading fields through classification dependent fields and a filter property.
It is a different way to configure cascading fields on the admin side, but on the user side it should be a similar experience. We have no plans to change this on the DAM.
Customer support service by UserEcho