Enter your enhancement requests or ideas for any of the components of the Aprimo SAAS platform, or vote for your preferred feature requests below.
For more information on how to use this forum: Aprimo Voice How-to-Guide
In the new EU, the activity list in the home page displays only 4 activites. If users want to see all activities, he had to go in "Acitivity Management" and "Activities". Users want to be able to see more than 4 acitvities in this list in the Home Page. It would be more practical for them.
When a project is created in Aprimo, the title defaults to the workflow template that was used to create the project. Project managers don't always update the title of the project to a unique name. In some cases, this is not necessarily part of their business process. In some processes, an extended attribute is used as the project "title", since an EA can be updated on a DCT and a project title cannot.
In New Nav, a project card might be useful to some users, but in cases where the title is not unique, it is difficult or impossible to find the project you are looking for since you can only search by title.
This request is to add Project ID to the search on the project card.
An example is below.
We used to have a Print icon in Aprimo Legacy Navigation, now that we have moved to Aprimo New Navigation the Print icon is no longer there. Our PM's used this Print option to print out the Team roster list in their Campaign.
Rather than having the options on the main navigation column in the new UI driven by domain rights, we would like to be able to configure the column as administrators and push out custom configuration/templates to our users. We currently have some menu options that users never have to use displayed.
A powerful use of the User Links card is to provide the functionality to run reports and dashboards directly from the home page. A user can take the URL of the report or dashboard and add it to the User Links card. In fact, in New Nav, you can grab any URL from the app, so another use case would be to create a quick link to a page you visit often in the application, such as My Tasks. However, when application URLs are added, the URL looks so similar you cannot tell the difference.
A great enhancement would be the ability to add a title to the URLs when you configure them on the User Link card. This way a user can create their own title and can immediately differentiate between the URLs.
See this mockup:
We think it'd be great if you could access the agile board or task worksheet directly from an activity card. Our users love these cards but at the moment they simply create a link to the project or Activity details. We'd like them to be a bit more interactive.
When opening tasks from My Tasks list it doesn't carryover the custom filters to the Inbox list. This requires users to page back to My Tasks to find their next task in the filtered list. This causes additional clicks compared to today's navigation. Our Compliance, State Filing, Asset Managers, Project Planners and Ops teams rely heavily on custom views to work efficiently
Our users that use the Activity and Project cards would like the ability to determine what fields are displayed. For example, business unit, cost center, task status and/or requester to name some. This would allow our different groups to display information that is important to them for those important projects. We envision these fields being configured by the user and then applied to any new Activity or Project card.
We'd like to propose a Project list card that you could filter, sort or group so that you can see projects Grouped by Activity. That would mean a lot less clicks for a user to get to the project they want to access. They currently have up to 5 clicks just to get to project details depending on the route you take.
Description: In situations where there are stringent security processes that limit system-admin access to user records, and in situations where we want to provide self-service access to full users, the My Profile page in the Portal was a good place for all users to make updates to their account, such as name, email address, etc.
In the New Navigation, there is no Portal and consequently the My Profile feature has been removed for full users. Only contributor users have access to this feature.
To say this another way: In Legacy Navigation, a full user can log into the portal and change their name, email, etc..
The request here is to reinstate the My Profile feature for all users in New Navigation.
As part of our regular business processes, users may have an average of 50 -100 in process tasks in queue.
Users regularly rely on the ability to see, filter and prioritize all of these tasks from the legacy Aprimo Home Page in the My Tasks section.
This existing functionality is critical, especially during our busy season, where users will have 100 in process tasks in queue.
Having a limit of only 25 tasks available in the Task Card impacts our productivity and ability to prioritize and process work.
This request is to increase the number of Tasks in the Task Card to 200.
While we understand that we can build a link from a User Link Card that will take users to their Tasks or navigate to the My Tasks from Project Management, these options add extra steps and clicks to the current, more efficient process.
We would like the ability to pull a card for proposal reviews on the homepage. Legacy homepage allows us to see proposal reviews in the my review section.
The new left navigation panel takes up a lot of real estate in the Inbox and doesn't stay collapsed when navigating between pages. We would like the panel to stay collapsed even when navigating to other pages until the user expands it.
New Navigation Submissions
The ability to open the “view details” of a Digital Asset in a new tab. This way users can have multiple Assets open, while also keeping the Digital Asset List open.The current functionality opens an Asset in the same tab that then requires users to page back each time and endure the loading time for the list window. Getting back to the list is slower when compared to the old navigation and becomes an issue when working with a lot of Assets.
We find it very difficult to visually distinguish required fields (no indicator, no asterisk, not bold) from optional fields (word "- optional") in italics after the field label. Are we seeing the final look of this field styling?
Customer support service by UserEcho