Enter your enhancement requests or ideas for any of the components of the Aprimo SAAS platform, or vote for your preferred feature requests below.
For more information on how to use this forum: Aprimo Voice How-to-Guide
As a user I need to accept terms an conditions when downloading an asset. That info is then captured and logged for auditing reasons later on.
as a user i want to subscribe to get notified of any changes to an individual record, changes to a set of records identified by a view and changes to a set of records belonging to a collection
When browsing classifications or classification list fields, if a classification does not have a child, there should not be a plus symbol next to the classification name.The plus symbol i
ndicates that a classification has a child, and when browsing larger, more complex classification structures, end users do not always know which classifications have children, causing a more difficult browsing experience. Also, after clicking on the + symbol next to a childless classification, the symbol disappears.
It would be great if DAM would have support for handling duplicates in the system upon ingestion. Currently, when an asset gets uploaded via UI, DAM can detect if the file is duplicate of an asset that already exists in the system, however user can disregard the message about duplicate and still publish the asset.
It would be good to give system administrators in DAM opportunity to configure desired behavior when duplicate is detected, so that publishing of duplicates can be prevented if so configured.
On a bigger scale, it would be good if this feature is applicable to all types of ingestion (including custom ingestion mechanisms, via REST API) so that ingestion can be prevented for duplicate assets if so configured by system administrators regardless of ingestion mechanism.
as a contributor i want to share a metadata template with another user or usergroup
This request is coming from Schneider Electric. The Export Metadata report from the DAM UI (select records > Export Metadata), combines all classifications, with their path, in the classifications column (column B). The request is to break out the classification list field values into separate columns - like all of the other data types. This would give every selection value its own column on the report, and would provide an easier way to filter on classification list fields.
As a user I want to be able to add a file from the "My Uploads"-page to an existing record as a new file version, so that i have an easy way to add a file as a new version if i detect it should be a new version (rather than a new record) after it was uploaded.
As a Contributor I want to be able to mark certain assets as require approval for download so that I can make sure that assets are used the way intended and I can control their usage. Assets that have a download option which requires an approval will prompt the user to enter why they need the asset. The request then goes to the approver; if the request is approved the requester will get a download link.
I have had requests to be able to search by image in order to find similar images or discover information attached to the original image (a feature available on Google Image Search and Shutterstock search).
See below for examples.
In order to overcome some of the shortcomings of file ingestion and the refactoring of our current on-prem solution to the Cloud, we need the ability to select a SOURCE asset and COPY ITS METADATA to one or more assets (in their basket selection).
We could have the user enter a metadata field on the Source One, then select the others, etc. - we're flexible on how this is solved for, but this would be very helpful in a variety of use cases.
Solutioned with Maja Pejcic and Arthrex
The client uses various different zip files to keep files together. To help the users in selecting the correct zipfile, an image from the zipfile is used as a preview image on the record using the zip file as the masterfile.
The new packages functionality unzips the package and you can setup a regex to select the required masterfile. However, in the above use case there is no rule possible to calculate the masterfile. To use a random file from the package as the master would be a bit strange.
Can you extend the package function to allow for the above?
In the current solution, the shared download link can be used by any person who clicks the link: there is no authentication check. We would like to change this shared download link to work like described below:
- The content sharer selects the asset(s) he wants to download
- Selects the Share action
- The content sharer selects with whom to share. This can be existing DAM users and/or external users. Who it’s possible to share with, the length of time the download is available, and whether the user must authenticate is controlled through configuration.
- Share with external users
- Share with DAM users
- Share with anyone
- Get a shareable link
- Upon receipt of the link, the content receiver clicks the link
- If the download is configured to require authentication, the content receiver is prompted with a login if not yet logged into the system
- Then download of the content is started and the user is downloading the content from the nearest geographical location
Each download event is recorded so that it can be used for reporting on download
CRC Checksum needs to be indexed and searchable.
Use case: When creating customization, especially the ones that are adding assets to DAM, we need to be able to check if there are duplicates in the DAM (based on CRC Checksum among other things).
As an administrator I would like to be able to get a report on who used the “Send a link to ADAM user…”-functionality. Currently there is no record of this, since it does not result in an actual download order.
Customer support service by UserEcho