Enter your enhancement requests or ideas for any of the components of the Aprimo SAAS platform, or vote for your preferred feature requests below.
For more information on how to use this forum: Aprimo Voice How-to-Guide
As a user I need to accept terms an conditions when downloading an asset. That info is then captured and logged for auditing reasons later on.
as a user i want to subscribe to get notified of any changes to an individual record, changes to a set of records identified by a view and changes to a set of records belonging to a collection
It would be great if DAM would have support for handling duplicates in the system upon ingestion. Currently, when an asset gets uploaded via UI, DAM can detect if the file is duplicate of an asset that already exists in the system, however user can disregard the message about duplicate and still publish the asset.
It would be good to give system administrators in DAM opportunity to configure desired behavior when duplicate is detected, so that publishing of duplicates can be prevented if so configured.
On a bigger scale, it would be good if this feature is applicable to all types of ingestion (including custom ingestion mechanisms, via REST API) so that ingestion can be prevented for duplicate assets if so configured by system administrators regardless of ingestion mechanism.
Current timestamp is off maybe due to time zone differences. Would be great if we see time stamps in user's time zone.
Currently this is not configurable.
This request is coming from Schneider Electric. The Export Metadata report from the DAM UI (select records > Export Metadata), combines all classifications, with their path, in the classifications column (column B). The request is to break out the classification list field values into separate columns - like all of the other data types. This would give every selection value its own column on the report, and would provide an easier way to filter on classification list fields.
When browsing classifications or classification list fields, if a classification does not have a child, there should not be a plus symbol next to the classification name.The plus symbol i
ndicates that a classification has a child, and when browsing larger, more complex classification structures, end users do not always know which classifications have children, causing a more difficult browsing experience. Also, after clicking on the + symbol next to a childless classification, the symbol disappears.
as a contributor i want to share a metadata template with another user or usergroup
In order to overcome some of the shortcomings of file ingestion and the refactoring of our current on-prem solution to the Cloud, we need the ability to select a SOURCE asset and COPY ITS METADATA to one or more assets (in their basket selection).
We could have the user enter a metadata field on the Source One, then select the others, etc. - we're flexible on how this is solved for, but this would be very helpful in a variety of use cases.
Solutioned with Maja Pejcic and Arthrex
As a user I want to be able to add a file from the "My Uploads"-page to an existing record as a new file version, so that i have an easy way to add a file as a new version if i detect it should be a new version (rather than a new record) after it was uploaded.
CRC Checksum needs to be indexed and searchable.
Use case: When creating customization, especially the ones that are adding assets to DAM, we need to be able to check if there are duplicates in the DAM (based on CRC Checksum among other things).
I have had requests to be able to search by image in order to find similar images or discover information attached to the original image (a feature available on Google Image Search and Shutterstock search).
See below for examples.
As a Contributor I want to be able to mark certain assets as require approval for download so that I can make sure that assets are used the way intended and I can control their usage. Assets that have a download option which requires an approval will prompt the user to enter why they need the asset. The request then goes to the approver; if the request is approved the requester will get a download link.
As an admin i want a classification list field to be configurable to only allow leaf level classification nodes to be selectable so I can ensure that assets get classified at the most specific level.
The 4 choices for Advanced Search (System properties, record specific, file specific, classication specific) are not intuitive. You have to click on each one to get to a common language option. Strongly recommend either re-naming or since the total list is relatively short, list all of the sub-categories at once to allow for a more seamless user experience.
As an admin, I want to be able to set file upload administrators that can manage all file uploads for all users of a certain group (vs. current state where they can manage all file uploads of all users in the system), so i can delegate upload monitoring/ asset reassignments on a team level. I don't necessarily want the user responsible for managing all uploads of the creative team to see all uploads of the marketing team (or assets of brand1 vs brand2).
Customer support service by UserEcho